New Russian Military

Started by Fenton, 22 August 2013, 06:46:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Last Hussar

Quote from: sebigboss79 on 23 August 2013, 07:25:31 AM
Looking good but beauty usually never wins wars.
Besides ease of maintenance did you know that just 60 % of the Warsaw Pact equipment was actually in any kind of state to be battleworthy withing "reasonable time" ?

Rumour has it that NATO would have outnumbered the Soviet tank formations 3/2....
Nonetheless remains the Merkava my favourite tank (eyecandy).

Yeah, but the NATO units were  not necessarily as battle worthy as you may think.  AFVs are like Just A Few Orcs' women - expensive and temperamental.
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Rob

Quote from: Last Hussar on 29 September 2013, 11:31:09 PM
Yeah, but the NATO units were  not necessarily as battle worthy as you may think.  AFVs are like Just A Few Orcs' women - expensive and temperamental.
I've heard it said that the Chieftain was the best tank in the world if it broke down in the right position.  :)

T13A

If I had to go to war in the mid 70's and I had a choice, it would have been in a Chieftain.

T13A Out!   ;)

Cheers Paul
T13A Out!

sebigboss79

Quote from: Last Hussar on 29 September 2013, 11:31:09 PM
Yeah, but the NATO units were  not necessarily as battle worthy as you may think.  AFVs are like Just A Few Orcs' women - expensive and temperamental.

I know the mobilisation figures and without support of the second wave Warsaw Pact gets slaughtered on their drive to the Rhine. If they ever reach that river the German army alone has mobilised 2,500+ Leo1 and 2s to counterassault, across the Rhine if need be. BAoR has been the top priority during cold war and the Americans had quite a stockple of stuff that shoots in storage in Germany.

French army was ready to use their whole nuclear stockpile should the Reds ever reach the Rhine and twice offered German governments partial control of these weapons should WW3 break out.

Honestly I cannot see the WP forces do anything but deal a heavy initial blow. Even if they dig in to conserve their territorial gains they will loose any war of attrition. The "Stay behind" forces were quite well trained and stockpiles of old materials would ensure a loooooong way to disarm and pacify those Germans who got caught on the wrong side and pissed at the Reds. Admitted a total surprise leaves a lot of German army reserves behind enemy lines.  I assume training of western allies was not any worse than German Bundeswehr draftees and those were quite well trained to sneak back to where they are needed, live off the land and give the occupying force a hard time while doing so.

Another matter is the make up of forces which for Germans and WP forces is almost entirely draftees. I would argue one of the sides would have draft offices stormed by people who want to take up weapons, never mind the training and shoot the invaders, whereas the other side would be asked why their children are sent into the meatgrinder.

And just for the record: The German army currently stockpiles more than 100,000 old G3 rifles and sufficient ammunition in case of national emergency. I would argue just in case, subject walks into local recruitment office, subject asks for gun, gets gun, starts shooting at the invader.

Former GDR Generals -who knew real world scenarios- were shown outdated logistic plans to move troops to the front and civilians to safety. Some rumours say they were impressed and assured the West German Generals if their defense plan was just half as good we would see zero ability to stop NATO forces on day X+30. Other rumours say some GDR Generals started crying and breaking down admitting total inability of the WP forces to do anything but get killed trying.

That does not diminish the danger of any WW3 scenario. Untill early 80s WP trained to time their assault 3 minutes before NATO starts moving. And we are talking tactical nukes combined with a massive chemical attack. WP estimated no survivors in their first wave on X+10 and as much as 50% casualties for the second wave following within 72 hours. The odds were not that much in WP favour as people normally think and readiness was always the strength of NATO.


Hertsblue

Quote from: Rob on 30 September 2013, 09:21:33 AM
I've heard it said that the Chieftain was the best tank in the world if it broke down in the right position.  :)

The main problem with the Chieftain's engine was that it was supposed to be polycarburant, i.e it would run on anything from chip-shop oil to petrol. Once they'd given up on that daft idea it ran reasonably well.
When you realise we're all mad, life makes a lot more sense.

www.rulesdepot.net

sebigboss79

Quote from: Hertsblue on 30 September 2013, 01:53:56 PM
The main problem with the Chieftain's engine was that it was supposed to be polycarburant, i.e it would run on anything from chip-shop oil to petrol. Once they'd given up on that daft idea it ran reasonably well.

Polycarburation (lol is that a word?) works very well on Leo 1s and 2s. Not to mention the M1 Abrams.
Maybe they should have taken the fish and chips OUT of the oil prior to filling it in?  :-\

Last Hussar

How would we cook the chips?  :o
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

sebigboss79


Hertsblue

Quote from: sebigboss79 on 30 September 2013, 02:31:53 PM
Polycarburation (lol is that a word?) works very well on Leo 1s and 2s. Not to mention the M1 Abrams.
Maybe they should have taken the fish and chips OUT of the oil prior to filling it in?  :-\


Believe it or not, it is perfectly possible to run an modified internal combustion engine on cooking oil.  :o
When you realise we're all mad, life makes a lot more sense.

www.rulesdepot.net

fsn

Are there a lot of fish and chip shops on the battlefield?

I had a mate in the 80's who had a Lada. He was half convinced that the Lada garages were just advance supply depots for T72s.
Lord Oik of Runcorn (You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013, 2014; Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!; 2017-2019 The Wilderness years
Oik of the Year 2020; 7 votes in the 2021 Painting Competition
11 votes in the 2022 Painting Competition (Double figures!)
2023 - the year of Gerald:
2024 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

Hertsblue

If the Lada was representative of the quality of the then current Soviet tank we could all sleep easier in our beds.  ;D
When you realise we're all mad, life makes a lot more sense.

www.rulesdepot.net

fsn

Hence the need for all those spares!
Lord Oik of Runcorn (You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013, 2014; Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!; 2017-2019 The Wilderness years
Oik of the Year 2020; 7 votes in the 2021 Painting Competition
11 votes in the 2022 Painting Competition (Double figures!)
2023 - the year of Gerald:
2024 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

sebigboss79

Quote from: Hertsblue on 01 October 2013, 08:47:38 AM

Believe it or not, it is perfectly possible to run an modified internal combustion engine on cooking oil.  :o

Absolutely, I would just argue the fish and the chips should be taken OUT before you use it. Has the advantage of well fed troops as a sideeffect....

Last Hussar

Actually a diesel (theoretically) needs no modification  to run on chip fat.  I reality the conversions start on diesel, and once warm switch over, then finish on diesel to make sure it is what is in the cylinder at next start up. 
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Hertsblue

I'm told the main drawback to running a vehicle on cooking oil is the smell. You could almost think you're driving a mobile chip-shop.  :)
When you realise we're all mad, life makes a lot more sense.

www.rulesdepot.net