Applique Track armour

Started by Heedless Horseman, 24 June 2015, 12:31:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

d_Guy

Fred,
Thanks! If AP rounds at that time relied on kinetics I can see where there is some skepticism about the use of logs. I must have been thinking about naval big gun rounds. Any opinions about the accuracy of Fury ( the movie)?
Encumbered by Idjits, we pressed on

fred.

I've not seen Fury - I'm not much into going to watch movies - I tend to catch them years later on TV.

But I suspect that like most movies the story and the visuals outweigh history and accuracy by a huge amount!

Some early, small AP shot had an explosive charge in it, but it was generally dropped.

I don't know too much about naval shells - but I wouldn't be surprised if they had an explosive charge inside - they are trying to make a mess of a much bigger volume than the inside of a tank!
2011 Painting Competition - 1 x Winner!
2012 Painting Competition - 2 x Runner-Up
2016 Painting Competition - 1 x Runner-Up!
2017 Paint-Off - 3 x Winner!

My wife's creations: Jewellery and decorations with sparkle and shine at http://www.Etsy.com/uk/shop/ISCHIOCrafts

Ithoriel

Yeah, most WW2 improvised armour was designed to deal with infantry anti-tank weapons. The Germans had some success with bedsteads, apparently bedsprings detonate RPG rounds. So I'm guessing logs and the like would work just as well.

Fury was pretty good on the accuracy front. There was some scepticism expressed about the ending where a lone, disabled tank held off an entire German infantry company but given the Audie Murphy was decorated for holding off a similar sized force with the AAMG of a tank destroyer which he fired from the engine deck of the vehicle .... WHICH WAS ON FIRE AT THE TIME! .... I think the crew of Fury were slightly less effective. :)

There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

fsn

On "Fury" IMHO, it was reasonably accurate in uniforms etc, but completely lacklustre in terms of acting and story. Why didn't these crack SS troops just rustle up a Panzerfaust and blow the bas... tank to bits? Achilles et al seemed to spend all there time hunkering inside which did seem to leave them open to close assault.

Lord Oik of Runcorn (You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013, 2014; Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!; 2017-2019 The Wilderness years
Oik of the Year 2020; 7 votes in the 2021 Painting Competition
11 votes in the 2022 Painting Competition (Double figures!)
2023 - the year of Gerald:
2024 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

Ithoriel

Quote from: fsn on 23 March 2016, 08:07:10 AM
Why didn't these crack SS troops just rustle up a Panzerfaust and blow the bas... tank to bits?

One man stood on the engine deck of a burning tank destroyer and hosed an attacking German force with MG fire. Why didn't someone just chuck a grenade and kill him? Because they didn't.

Why didn't the film Germans use a panzerfaust? Perhaps the were out of them? Perhaps everyone thought someone else was about to? Perhaps some fresh-out-of-training 17 year-old officer wanted them to save panzerfausts in case they met a more formidable armoured force? So many options. :)

For me "Fury" was a much better film than some treadheads would have me believe :)
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

d_Guy

As a viewer with limited knowledge the tank vs tanks battle in "Fury" seemed particularly well done. Four American Shermans (?) take on one German Tiger (which model I know not). Actually three Shermans since one was taken out by ambush by the first shot from the Tiger on the American's flank as they advanced in column down a road. The three remaining tanks (one of which is "Fury") swing into line to engage the enemy. As soon as the Americans perceive they are up against a Tiger they fire smoke and rapidly pull back (until they are hemmed in by trees). I won't describe the rest of the action (since some may still want to see the movie without spoilers)

Apropos to the discussion, however, Fury takes one hit in the flank directly were a log bundle is attached to the hull. The shell destroys the logs but is deflected. Since later in the action Fury takes another hit near the front corner (I think) which caroms off, is it possible that the appliqué armor is added to produce as many angles as possible in addition to resistance to penetration?

In any case the tank battle (plus tanks operating with infantry assaulting a fixed position) are worth the price of admission to seeing the movie.

The Audie Murphy assessment was amusing Lthoriel!  :).
Sometimes in wargaming we roll a six a dozen times in a row - and then say the final outcome isn't realistic - but maybe it is!
Encumbered by Idjits, we pressed on

Wulf

Fury was good hollywood, but not realistic. On the other hand, neither is reality, sometimes...

Zulu was inaccurate, but the real story is just as astounding.


Matt J

didn't Audie Murphy call in artillery support though

and in Fury I think it was a Battalion of SS infantry not a company. Ruined the film for me which is a shame as Guy has pointed out the Sherman v Tiger battle was really well done.
2012 Painting Competition - Winner!
2014 Painting Competition - 3 x Winner!
2014 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!
2015 Painting Competition - 2 x Winner!
Beep

Wulf

Well, the Tiger commander would never have survived that long if he charged across open fields at enemy tanks, so not that well done. But it did let us see the Tiger, so I enjoyed it...

fsn

Lord Oik of Runcorn (You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013, 2014; Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!; 2017-2019 The Wilderness years
Oik of the Year 2020; 7 votes in the 2021 Painting Competition
11 votes in the 2022 Painting Competition (Double figures!)
2023 - the year of Gerald:
2024 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

Ithoriel

Quote from: Matt J on 23 March 2016, 04:21:20 PM
didn't Audie Murphy call in artillery support though

and in Fury I think it was a Battalion of SS infantry not a company. Ruined the film for me which is a shame as Guy has pointed out the Sherman v Tiger battle was really well done.

"Lt. Murphy was serving as company commander in the Holzwihr forest on 26 January 1945.  His unit had been completely decimated - he had 19 men left in his company that was once 128 strong - and had been assigned to hold the critical Colmar Pocket region from a German counterattack.  He had two M-10 tank destroyers attached to his unit, and was expecting and additional two companies of infantry to come cover his flank.

It was a cold, rainy morning when Lt. Murphy first noticed the battalion of German mechanized infantry heading towards his position.  Three companies of Nazi soldiers and half a dozen heavy Tiger tanks were bearing down on him.  Murphy radioed to HQ, only to find that the two companies of supporting infantry he was expecting to hold the flank were not going to arrive in time.  Audie was alone and outnumbered, but it was his duty to hold this position and he knew what he had to do.

He send his men back to take defensive positions behind him, and called the M-10s forward to take out some of the German armor.  Within minutes, both vehicles had been knocked out like chumps.  Now it was just Audie against an impossibly large force of German troops.  Instead of falling back to safety like a regular, sane person, Murphy instead jumped up and manned the .50 caliber machinegun mounted one of the burning, disabled M-10s.  He got on the radio with Command HQ and started calling in artillery strikes to hit the German positions.  Shells rained down, taking out Nazis all over the place, but it wasn't enough.  Lt. Murphy opened up the machinegun from his completely exposed position and stared mowing down Krauts left and right.  Artillery continued to pound the Germans while Murphy shot the sh*t out of them.  Before long the German losses were so great that the Tiger tanks had to pull back because they had lost most of their infantry support.  Audie continued to fire until he ran out of bullets, then dismounted the M-10 only seconds before the entire vehicle exploded.  He rallied his men, and the small group of Americans charged forward and routed the German forces.  The Colmar Pocket had held."

The crew of Fury only had to deal with one Tiger tank and they were still mobile ... and not on fire ... wusses :)

Not saying the events in Fury are an everyday story of American tankies, just that it's not as unbelievable as some seem to think.
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

d_Guy

Quote from: fsn on 23 March 2016, 04:59:01 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_131  :D



Thanks for that link fsn. Followed others from that page and learned that all of the tanks in Fury were provided by the Bovington Tank Museum! That would be something to see! Feeling the usual stirring that arises when wanting to do another period! Must resist!
From things that go clank-clank in the night, dear Lord preserve us!  :)

Encumbered by Idjits, we pressed on

fsn

They have a "Fury"exhibit at Bovington now, and Tiger 131 is still to be seen.
Lord Oik of Runcorn (You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013, 2014; Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!; 2017-2019 The Wilderness years
Oik of the Year 2020; 7 votes in the 2021 Painting Competition
11 votes in the 2022 Painting Competition (Double figures!)
2023 - the year of Gerald:
2024 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

mart678

There is a picture in one of the many Concord press style books which shows a Sherman in Normandy actually called Fury and I though the film portrayed life in a Tank very well as even today they design them but forget the Crew need to actually live in them and carry there own kit like change of uniforms sleeping bags oh! almost forgot Food  :D :D

toxicpixie

And a kettle. Got to have tea! Having several British tank crew they've always been most chuffed at the expression on other nations crews faces when they pop out the hatch complete with freshly made, steaming hot tea :D
I provide a cheap, quick painting service to get you table top quality figures ready to roll - www.facebook.com/jtppainting