Nachod 1866 - a Bloody Big Battles game

[Chris Pringle]

What did you think then - two Skirmisher or more for the Prussians? If the Austrians lose their S and gain A, what does that do to balance in scenario terms?

I reckon just give each Prussian infantry unit S rating (1 Skirmisher base only) and change the Austrian S to A. I think it's a tough scenario for the Prussians as it stands, so this would actually improve scenario balance.

Chris

[Leman]

This has been a fascinating thread, as I will be launching into the Bohemian arena after Langensalza. These will be home-based games, with the 6mm FPW continuing down the club.

[mollinary]

I reckon just give each Prussian infantry unit S rating (1 Skirmisher base only) and change the Austrian S to A. I think it's a tough scenario for the Prussians as it stands, so this would actually improve scenario balance.

Chris

I think there is a case for varying this depending on the scale you are using.  BBB is pretty well unique in varying strengths per stand from about 500 to 2500 in its official scenarios, as well as dramatically changing ground and time scale. All these mean games represent rather different levels of tactical feel.  My starting point was always Fire and Fury, so I prefer smaller numbers represented by a stand. With 500 men per stand for the corps on corps battles of this war, a brigade would contain about 14 bases. Thus I would tend to split it to the regimental level. If you do this for the Austrians you have the choice of having half the brigade with its Jäger battalion, and the other half without. You could make them all Aggressive, but only give Skirmish ability to the half with the Jägers. Personally, I believe giving each Prussian unit the skirmish capability is the minimum to get proper period flavour (for the FPW I would be inclined to leave it at that, but that is another story) for the APW, and I would be inclined to give them 2.  Nachod has a particular problem as a scenario, as the Prussians deployed their advanced guard in half battalions, as the only way to cover the ground above the Nachod defile.  Where your smallest unit is a brigade it is very difficult to get this effect.  I haven't tried it, but it might be worth a go at doing this in 1:250 per base, and deploying the advance guard in units of 2S strength.  This is one of the positive aspects of the rules which appeals to me, the ability to tinker to match a scenario.

Mollinary

[Dave Fielder]

The exactness of defiles, where cavalry was placed, the size of Zug formations, the colours of gaiter buttons ... all these details pale into insignificance when playing a fun game with a good set of rules and a decent opponent. BBB and the 1866 match really well, you can mix and match all you want with these rules ... but just have fun and don't get hung up on whether Studnitz wrote his diary on a Tuesday or Wednesday.

[Dave Fielder]

... and who said the Austrians won this game? I demand a recount.

[toxicpixie]

Austrian skirmish ability/stands - I'm unfussed in playing at a smaller level than BBB uses (as the default 1000 man, with 500 for the smaller training scenarios at a push), and doubly so for the APW, so dropping to 250 men per stand doesn't really interest me. What I do wonder (as discussed above, off list and elsewhere ) is - does the Jaeger presence warrant giving each Brigade an S rating, or make one four stands with S rating and one 3 stands without. As I'm more than half swayed away from giving them S at all, you can change that to A ratings instead with the same question

Or, should the Austrian Divisions be used in place of the Brigades, so you have a manouvre unit at 7 S/A P T Trn MLR? I think that's too much, as to me one of the "features" is the inability for Corps commanders to actually mass their Brigades up and go in together in a supported attack.

Also, Daves set up has kind of reminded me of a more Austrian favourable Gitchen where the stray "disengage immediately" order arrives just before the Austrians are pinned in place instead of just after

[Steve J]

Well we played Trautenau last night and certainly a dramatic game full of action. A full AAR to follow in due course. We tried out the Austrians as Agressive instead of Skirmishers, which I think felt more historically accurate but certainly changed the way they played. Again more details to follow when I've collected my thoughts.

and a decent opponent.

Decent as in 'he's a decent sort of chap' or as in 'he gives me a decent challenge in the game'  ?

[Dave Fielder]

As in ... "He's decent enough to smile nicely when he is handed back his Corps as a bag of bones"

[Steve J]

 

Now you've spoilt the outcome of the battle

[Chris Pringle]

What I do wonder (as discussed above, off list and elsewhere ) is - does the Jaeger presence warrant giving each Brigade an S rating, or make one four stands with S rating and one 3 stands without. As I'm more than half swayed away from giving them S at all, you can change that to A ratings instead with the same question

Once you get down to that level of granularity, you could reasonably represent a brigade as two units, both rated A, and the one with the Jaegers might or might not merit S. In the pre-publication discussion of this, I think 'flavour' won out over realism, i.e., we rated them S because players wanted Jaegers to get an S. With brigade-sized units that over-rates them, especially when the Prussians get under-rated.

The more important thing probably is to rate all the Prussian units S. If you do that, letting Austrian Jaegers in half-brigade units have S as well is probably OK.

Chris

[Chris Pringle]

Well we played Trautenau last night and certainly a dramatic game full of action. A full AAR to follow in due course.

AAR yes please!

[cameronian]

Austrian skirmish ability/stands - I'm unfussed in playing at a smaller level than BBB uses (as the default 1000 man, with 500 for the smaller training scenarios at a push), and doubly so for the APW, so dropping to 250 men per stand doesn't really interest me. What I do wonder (as discussed above, off list and elsewhere ) is - does the Jaeger presence warrant giving each Brigade an S rating, or make one four stands with S rating and one 3 stands without. As I'm more than half swayed away from giving them S at all, you can change that to A ratings instead with the same question

Or, should the Austrian Divisions be used in place of the Brigades, so you have a manouvre unit at 7 S/A P T Trn MLR? I think that's too much, as to me one of the "features" is the inability for Corps commanders to actually mass their Brigades up and go in together in a supported attack.

Also, Daves set up has kind of reminded me of a more Austrian favourable Gitchen where the stray "disengage immediately" order arrives just before the Austrians are pinned in place instead of just after

You know an Austrian infantry division comprises two companies not two brigades don't you.

[toxicpixie]

Yes, sorry not that level of division, but the non-existent level below Corps of two brigades which i'd used as mental short hand when translating/thinking about real world to game set up Bad habit, compounded by not stating my assumptions

Should probably have said "would it be better to combine pairs of brigades and make them seven stands with A and S ratings etc etc"! Which I wouldn't want to do as it makes Austrian command and control far to simple for the player and doesn't reflect Corps commanders awkwardness in controlling their brigades and getting them into action together instead of however and wherever they contacted the enemy.