QuoteSlightly less armour and faster

Yes, but given the granularity of the CWC system, would the in-game stats be any different?

If you up the speed to 25, that's the same as the Challengers. Really?

I can see more of an argument for dropping the armour to 5, so it would match with M48/M60. I think the later Centurions maybe over-armoured with 6.

I'll see if I can find my stats

Took a hunt but I made it :- 5/120   5/100   3   5   4 Speed is 25 and it has IRNF.

QuoteThat one's on the revision list, the new stats will be:

T-10M    155    AFV    15    6/60    6/60    6    3    -/- [9]

Brilliant, Thanks

Err, isn't the T-10 still 6 hits saving on a 3?  Seems a bit generous.

Quote from: Big Insect on 24 May 2022, 11:21:39 AMA Type 56 should in effect be the same at RPG-2 (in game terms).

Both should be the same points (15pts) and both should have the same stats (AP: 3/10 |AT:3/10H)

I'll do a check across all the appropriate lists and adjust (45pts is a typo) 

Thanks
Mark

The statsof Rpg-2 are correct for all the lists including NVA and Vietcong

Sorry the uppers post war a question.

QuoteSorry the uppers post war a question.

Ahead of the launch of 'continuity' errata update, I am not publishing any of the revised stats on a 1-off basis.

However, as a general rule, if you think that a stat is incorrect, the best approach is to go back to the same weapon stats in the on-line army list for the manufacturing country (Soviet Union, UK, USA, France, China etc.) and use that as a default.
I am currently stuck in-bed with flu - so this is fullest extent of my answer on the matter - at present   
(cough cough cough)
Mark

Ok. Story.
Thanks.

Quote from: Leon on 06 May 2024, 09:23:27 PMThe revision work on all of the lists is pending and should be done soon, the delays are completely at my end of things.  Getting ready for Salute took up most of March and then we're straight into two more shows at Falkirk and Partizan.  As soon as we've got some clear water I'll start working through them.

It is now mid-2025 and I had reason to go back to this section of the forum for the first time in a long time.  I'm left wondering what happened to the "continuity project/errata/list revision?

Quote from: dylan on 02 July 2025, 06:32:16 AMIt is now mid-2025 and I had reason to go back to this section of the forum for the first time in a long time.  I'm left wondering what happened to the "continuity project/errata/list revision?

Still very much a 'work-in-progress' ... we are now applying the upgraded stats to all the lists (& there are a lot of them) and then they need manual checking 
But thankyou for keeping an eye on this 
Cheers
Mark

Quote from: dylan on 02 July 2025, 06:32:16 AMIt is now mid-2025 and I had reason to go back to this section of the forum for the first time in a long time.  I'm left wondering what happened to the "continuity project/errata/list revision?

Still being worked on at my end, but as of tonight I'm at just over 42000 data points checked, out of around 56000 total...! 

As the new revised lists are out. This thread will be locked, shortly.

A new CWC II list erratta thread will be created, shortly.

If you can just all hold your horses until the new thread is ready, it would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks to Leon for undertaking this massive task.

Your patience is much appreciated
Mark