Thanks John, I'll have a look.
Dave.

My 12 month ECW project finally reaches the most critical element

These wee fluffy lads sure look important, make sure they end up pristine!

Also, how easy is it to take off minis from hot glue?

One of the woolly troopers needs a banner with a cross St George.

Quote from: The_Wrong_Khovanskiy on 20 April 2021, 11:05:33 AM
Also, how easy is it to take off minis from hot glue?

Its just cheap PVA (Poundland type) so it holds them for painting (mostly!) but they either  pull or can be wobbled off.  levered by the base if they have weak legs.

Behold the Lamb of Cod!

Quote from: FierceKitty on 20 April 2021, 11:13:28 AM
One of the woolly troopers needs a banner with a cross St George.

I was going to base 1/2 of  them with a general and have them follow him around like er... loyal subjects
And the other 1/2 getting in the way of a wagon

I'm sure they're sheeply devoted to their leader.

Two more battalia done, this time Essex's Lord Generals  Rgt for Parliament. Note that in For King and Parliament these are classed as large units hence the third rank. Now I'm not sure if this gives them a bit of a Thirty Years war look about them but as I couldn't extend the frontage I had no choice, what do you recon?







A couple more here: https://thenorthumbrianwargamer.blogspot.com/search/label/10mm%20ECW

The sheepman tag is from my farming days, you can well understand that the lads at the club let me know all of the connotations of my past association with livestock, but I'm broad shouldered enough to take it, well if you can't laugh at yourself and all that! 
Still can't seem to make these photos smaller, where precisely do I type in the numbers to do this?
Dave.

Very nice indeed.

You need to add Width= within the [img] tag. Can never remember the number but 500 and 800 come to mind.

800

I know.  they don't call us toysoldierman even though we have hundreds of them.  But just one sheep and.......

Quote from: Lord Speedy of Leighton on 02 May 2021, 02:17:27 PM
800

Knew it were one of tut 2.

Seems a bit better.
Thanks guys, Dave.

Still looks more ECW than TYW to me

[img width=900]https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-oOZZWWdk854/YI6jADx_gaI/AAAAAAAAI1M/F-lL7Egxy1oCuRCPthkU5vfsA6-ZKMXrgCLcBGAsYHQ/s2048/DSC_6019.JPGwidth=200[/img]

In the first img tag insert width=900

Very nice

Agreed, these are very nicely done.

(possibly) stupid question - shouldn't it be "For King or Parliament"?

Quote from: Raider4 on 03 May 2021, 09:21:44 AM
(possibly) stupid question - shouldn't it be "For King or Parliament"?

I believe it comes from the start of the war where a man was stopped by some royalists and asked if he was for king or parliament and he replied "I am for King AND Parliament" as the Parliamentary side still professed loyalty to the King, and insisted that it was simply the King was under the influence of unsavoury advisors who led him astray, thereby giving legitimately to their cause.

The Royalists killed the man as a traitor if memory serves.

What do you guys recon to the slight mix of uniform colours, I would guess that complete uniformity would have been difficult to achieve even at the beginning of a campaign never mind when wear and tear set in. I decided to have a theme colour using the little info out there but I thought every man identical would be a little unrealistic. Just a guess of course but what do you think?
Dave.