1813 allies - command structure

Started by Last Hussar, 11 June 2024, 12:04:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Last Hussar

Hi all

How effective was the command structure in 1813 of Austrian/Russian combined armies? Was there one overall commander, and the allies would follow his orders, or was each countries army commanded individually?

I ask for Blucher - you get 1 command dice per 100 points in the army. Should I do 4 dice for all, or roll 2 dice for the Russians (ONLY), then 2 dice for the Austrians (ONLY)?
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

fsn

Schwarzenberg was nominally in overall command, but he was gifted with kings and emperors giving him advice.

Bit like the way Eisenhower was "in charge" of Monty and Patton. 
Lord Oik of Runcorn (You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013, 2014; Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!; 2017-2019 The Wilderness years
Oik of the Year 2020; 7 votes in the 2021 Painting Competition
11 votes in the 2022 Painting Competition (Double figures!)
2023 - the year of Gerald:
2024 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

Last Hussar

Patton DEFINATELY knew who was in charge ... and didn't he just hate it!
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Ithoriel

Hah! Came here to make the Montgomery/ Patton analogy myself.

Great minds, fsn, great minds! :)
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

Last Hussar

I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

fred.

I'd split the command dice - especially if you have separate players for the Russians and Austrians. 
2011 Painting Competition - 1 x Winner!
2012 Painting Competition - 2 x Runner-Up
2016 Painting Competition - 1 x Runner-Up!
2017 Paint-Off - 3 x Winner!

My wife's creations: Jewellery and decorations with sparkle and shine at http://www.Etsy.com/uk/shop/ISCHIOCrafts

Last Hussar

For two players I would.  You think this is reasonable for a single allied commander then?
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

fred.

If there is 1 commander it would work - but might just be a bit fiddly to track. Depends on your players. 
2011 Painting Competition - 1 x Winner!
2012 Painting Competition - 2 x Runner-Up
2016 Painting Competition - 1 x Runner-Up!
2017 Paint-Off - 3 x Winner!

My wife's creations: Jewellery and decorations with sparkle and shine at http://www.Etsy.com/uk/shop/ISCHIOCrafts

Last Hussar

It's down to which method I follow;
2 armies of 200 points each with 2d6 command points, or
1 army of 400 points with 4d6 command points.

It's not much in "fiddleliness", just want to be more 'historical'.
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry