Suppressed FAOs

Started by richafricanus, 09 March 2025, 05:46:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

richafricanus

Are suppressed FAO's unable to call in fire or can they do so with a -2CV as per the Command modifiers table on p.22?

Big Insect

As page 22 states - they can attempt a call in but at a -2 to their CV

 :)
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis

This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. Remember that dyslexics are often high-level conceptualisers who provide "outside of the box" thinking.

Amra

Page 22 refers to Commands from Co/HQ s and seems clear
I think he was asking about FAOs , they don't have any factors for being suppressed
So does a Sniper stop them trying to call in ?

Last Hussar

I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Duke Speedy of Leighton

You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner

Last Hussar

I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Amra

Ah Speedy , wait I think I've got it
P22 says "if your Command unit is suppressed " but it means any Command unit involved in any action ?
So , including the FAO , who technically isn't in the section on p22 ?
I mean the CO isn't involved is he ? The FAO makes his own test to call in based on all the factors on p48 . There's no mention of suppression, but we're supposed to infer that p22 applies even though no other factors on p22 are relevant
Is that right ?

Big Insect

Quote from: Duke Speedy of Leighton on 11 March 2025, 02:33:41 PMBut that's a +2CV

It's a -2 to the command value or a +2 to the dice roll
Both are detrimental and that is the desired effect.
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis

This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. Remember that dyslexics are often high-level conceptualisers who provide "outside of the box" thinking.

Amra

Ok ,but this really needs errata I think

The only clue we have is in the definition of suppression which says " suppressed command units may only issue orders at a significant disadvantage" .We then go to p22 to find out the disadvantage
 
Adding an extra line to the FAO table on p48 would ,in my opinion, make things a lot more clear

Big Insect

Quote from: Amra on 13 March 2025, 12:20:38 AMOk ,but this really needs errata I think

The only clue we have is in the definition of suppression which says " suppressed command units may only issue orders at a significant disadvantage" .We then go to p22 to find out the disadvantage
 
Adding an extra line to the FAO table on p48 would ,in my opinion, make things a lot more clear

NOTED - thanks
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis

This communication has been written by a dyslexic person. If you have any trouble with the meaning of any of the sentences or words, please do not be afraid to ask for clarification. Remember that dyslexics are often high-level conceptualisers who provide "outside of the box" thinking.