Pendraken Miniatures Forum

Pendraken News & Info! => General Pendraken => Topic started by: Nellkyn on 26 March 2014, 05:06:19 PM

Title: Riderless Horses
Post by: Nellkyn on 26 March 2014, 05:06:19 PM
Leon or anyone,

Does Pendraken do riderless horses?
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: mollinary on 26 March 2014, 06:56:36 PM
AU20 in the Austrian 1860s range. I expect they are also available in one or other of the ACW  ranges.

Mollinary
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Leon on 26 March 2014, 07:00:50 PM
Yep, there's the standing horses, code AU20 in the Austrian range, and the same horses are coded as ACW35 in the ACW range as well.  Other than those, we've got the regular limber/artillery horses which we can supply individually as well.

8)
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Nellkyn on 26 March 2014, 10:06:33 PM
Excellent. Thanks for the help chaps,
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Hertsblue on 27 March 2014, 09:21:34 AM
How elaborate/modern is the horse furniture on these models? I'm going to need held horses for the early eighteenth century at some point in the near future.
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Ace of Spades on 27 March 2014, 10:59:33 AM
The standig horses wear simple saddles with blanketrolls both in front and rear. They have the straps from the saddle to the tail (sorry, don't know the english word for it...) and the breastharness ('martingale' I believe it is called...?). The saddle itself is a very simple, rounded affair with short stirrups.
The artilleryhorses won't work I fear simply because they are galloping. I must say that standing artilleryhorses would be very nice for most (if not all) ranges!
Hope this helps...

Cheers,
Rob
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Leon on 27 March 2014, 01:28:56 PM
Quote from: Ace of Spades on 27 March 2014, 10:59:33 AM
The artilleryhorses won't work I fear simply because they are galloping. I must say that standing artilleryhorses would be very nice for most (if not all) ranges!
Hope this helps...

The limber horses are all in a walking/standing type pose, certainly not galloping!  Unless you've been feeding them something funny...!   :D
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Ace of Spades on 27 March 2014, 03:19:40 PM
I believe I'm the only one that paints with enamels; you think that might have something to do with it...? :-\
On the other hand; 'trotting' was the word I should have used probably! Still; I consider them to be moving; not standing :P

Cheers!
Rob
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Leon on 27 March 2014, 03:21:41 PM
Quote from: Ace of Spades on 27 March 2014, 03:19:40 PM
I believe I'm the only one that paints with enamels; you think that might have something to do with it...? :-\

:D
Title: Re: Riderless Horses
Post by: Genom on 27 March 2014, 08:43:58 PM
There's some in the Mongol stuff as well isn't there? Need to go check the box.