:D
http://www.savethefrogs.com/day/ (http://www.savethefrogs.com/day/)
(http://www.indianflutemusic.com/images/STF-Day-Icon-2011-220.jpg)
Now finally, something WORTH celebrating!
;D
Are there any 10mm minis we could use for this 8)
Small frogs?! http://www.pendraken.co.uk/AC3-p5122/ (http://www.pendraken.co.uk/AC3-p5122/) :D
High Treason, but why not introduce some into a certain large pile in the Big-eaded *hity down sarth.
IanS
Finaly! :D :D
As a breeder of rare frog species I'm happy.
Something other than ********ing royals.
See not just toy soldiers and dressing up in silly costumes, lot's of daft hobbies.
Huzzah for the FROGS!!!! 8) 8) 8)
Can't believe that I am so outnumbered and surrounded by philistines! >:(
Are there no other royalists left standing? ~X(
Well at least I know when the day comes....... where to find you all, to round up and put in the field I have set aside for 'the' task! :-q
Love frogs as well though. :D
Quote from: commission on 27 April 2011, 09:25:17 PM
Are there no other royalists left standing? ~X(
Well at least I know when the day comes....... where to find you all, to round up and put in the field I have set aside for 'the' task! :-q
Love frogs as well though. :D
There are plenty - God Save the Queen! ;)
I'll bring the axe :d
and whilst I'm a complete Francophile, I hate frogs :D ;D
It's a pity Cromwell didn't leave a competant sucessor.
The Royals are an irrelavance, only useful to generate tourist money.
I HATE WEDDINGS.
IanS
Anyway, how can a helicopter pilot who only earns £37000 a year afford Westminster Abbey? Let alone all the security!
Who voted for them?
Nothing wrong with royalty that Oliver Cromwell couldn't sort out.
The Queen/King serves a useful purpose from a constitutional point of view by raising the head of state above the politicians but not having any real power.
Unfortunately the media circus now treat the whole royal thing as if it's important but what they actually mean by "important" is that they can sell lots of copy by treating royals like super fotballers wives.
At least this wedding isn't as hyped as the Charles and Diana one, I worked in London then and it was a right pain.
Fair point DanJ.
Leon - look what you started!!!!
Quote from: commission on 28 April 2011, 08:52:51 AM
Fair point DanJ.
Leon - look what you started!!!!
I know!
I'll cheer everyone up with some Will and Kate merchandise...
(http://www.totalmerchandise.co.uk/uploads/product-images/Royal_Wedding_Loony_Lugs.jpg)
(http://blog.weddingchaos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/gnomes.jpg)
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b4-RXRxkOP8/TWUExFjMDHI/AAAAAAAAAgQ/qM78sPj1akg/s1600/RoyalSickBag.jpg)
and :D
(http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/royal-condoms1.jpg)
I'm a Communist Royalist.
I would REALLY have struggled to pick a side in the 16040's... :-SS
16040? Is that a future civil war in the 40k universe?
Quote from: Sandinista on 28 April 2011, 01:29:14 PM
16040? Is that a future civil war in the 40k universe?
LOL ;D
I was about to say "Now you've done it! Ammo for GW to create another sh*t rule set!!!" Then I remembered 1644 :'(