Pendraken Miniatures Forum

Non-Wargaming Discussion => Chat & News => Topic started by: T13A on 20 September 2020, 07:02:24 PM

Title: Film 1917
Post by: T13A on 20 September 2020, 07:02:24 PM
Hi

I realize that I am rather late to the party but I have just got around to watching '1917' on DVD. Is is just me who thought that the story/plot was, to put it mildly, ridiculous, or am I missing something?

Disappointed.

Cheers Paul
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: fsn on 20 September 2020, 07:44:38 PM
Nope. With you on that one.

Very disappointing.
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: Kiwidave on 20 September 2020, 08:20:42 PM
Nope - definitly ridiculous.
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: Ithoriel on 20 September 2020, 09:23:10 PM
Loved it.

A rollicking "Boy's Own" adventure story with proper period trappings, beautifully shot and well paced. Some good set pieces too.
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: Leon on 20 September 2020, 10:41:58 PM
I've not seen it yet but I've been waiting for it to appear on Sky.  We know someone who worked as a consultant on it, training the extras and stuff, and he said that the attention to detail was excellent.  I guess it'll be like Saving Private Ryan, a plotline that would never happen in real life but it makes for a good story.  
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: John Cook on 20 September 2020, 11:43:15 PM
I thought it was rubbish, to be honest.
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: pierre the shy on 21 September 2020, 05:19:21 AM
I also only saw this recently and have to say I'm 50:50 on the film.

The period detail was really good but I did find the plotline a step too far.

If the High Command wanted to stop the attack I would have found it much more believable if the two privates were ordered to escort one the staff officers (or even a fresh faced 2nd Lt) across no-mans land to stop the attacking force. There could have been plenty of scope for tension and drama between them to make the journey interesting.

     
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: Lord Kermit of Birkenhead on 21 September 2020, 06:08:36 AM
I enjoyed it, but think it should have been "1916" no shell holes or rain.
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: fsn on 21 September 2020, 06:48:18 AM
Quote from: pierre the shy on 21 September 2020, 05:19:21 AM
If the High Command wanted to stop the attack I would have found it much more believable if the two privates were ordered to escort one the staff officers (or even a fresh faced 2nd Lt) across no-mans land to stop the attacking force. There could have been plenty of scope for tension and drama between them to make the journey interesting.
   

How about dropping a message from an aircraft?
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: Duke Speedy of Leighton on 21 September 2020, 06:57:49 AM
Weighted ribbon sock, we have them in the museum 
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: Westmarcher on 21 September 2020, 09:36:35 AM
La, La, La, La, La, La, la, La, la, La, la, La, la, La, la, La, la ......
X_X X_X X_X X_X X_X X_X X_X X_X X_X X_X

(I've not seen it yet)
Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: pierre the shy on 21 September 2020, 10:51:46 AM
Quote from: fsn on 21 September 2020, 06:48:18 AM
How about dropping a message from an aircraft?

It might shorten the movie somewhat fsn, unless the aircraft runs into this chap and his flying circus on the way to drop the message......




Title: Re: Film 1917
Post by: steve_holmes_11 on 21 September 2020, 11:01:31 AM
Quote from: fsn on 21 September 2020, 06:48:18 AM
How about dropping a message from an aircraft?

That's a "Fly the Eagles to Mordor" solution.
Sensible, but no story.