Good morning everyone.
Am I missing something? I'm looking for some horses, without saddles etc. I can't find them, but I'm sure I''ve seen some naked horses.
Help!
Quote from: fsn on 21 March 2018, 12:01:49 PM
Am I missing something? I'm looking for some horses, without saddles etc. I can't find them, but I'm sure I''ve seen some naked horses.
We have indeed had them sculpted but there's going to be 3 sets (naked, saddled, and baggaged - maybe not a word?) so they're still with the sculptor while he does those conversions. We can send you some of the original nekkid ones if you like though, I've got some spares from the master mould on the side here?
Oh, thank you.
I am content to wait.
TBH, it'll just start me off on another project that I don't need ... yet.
I call them 'empty horses'.
Non-tacky horses
Or perhaps just "Horses"? :- :-
Mollinary
Free.
Oh...like free-range! :-bd
Mollinary, the problem with just horses is they could be hobby, clothes, saw, etc. :D
Quote from: d_Guy on 21 March 2018, 07:53:56 PM
Oh...like free-range! :-bd
Mollinary, the problem with just horses is they could be hobby, clothes, saw, etc. :D
Not really -Horses are horses. If they are not just Horses, then they can be qualified with an adjective. 8)
Surely, if they are not just horses, then they are ... unjust horses :D :D :D
Quote from: mollinary on 21 March 2018, 08:03:21 PM
Not really -Horses are horses. If they are not just Horses, then they can be qualified with an adjective. 8)
I can fault neither your grammar nor your logic. ;)
A horse is a horse, of course, of course...
Or even double plus unjust horses.
Or possibly Tesco's Lasangna
Are they shod or unshod ;)
Wearing Doc Martins is what I've been told...
Tackless. . . ;)
;D ;D