Pendraken Miniatures Forum

Wider Wargaming => Batreps => Topic started by: slimreidy1 on 10 December 2016, 04:34:35 PM

Title: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: slimreidy1 on 10 December 2016, 04:34:35 PM

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-F59bRRNJgAw/WEsDTos5P1I/AAAAAAAAFkg/DwR5HsbnINc/s640/blogger-image-1617091940.jpg)

I quite fancied a ACW game so We decided to Refight the battle of Wilsons creek from the Blackpowder supplement glory hallelujah. It turned out to be quite an eventful game, you can check out my report of the battle at my blog on the following link with plenty of photos.
http://slimreidy1.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/refighting-battle-of-wilsons-creek-acw.html
Cheers
Neil

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-cvcKKFrPqqI/WEsDIQJ08LI/AAAAAAAAFkQ/1JxFTnjTzWY/s640/blogger-image--1613619694.jpg)

(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-h2mn764TVrw/WEsDkae3ZvI/AAAAAAAAFk4/GG6DFvnJF9A/s640/blogger-image-1802787523.jpg)

Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: KTravlos on 10 December 2016, 06:11:46 PM
Good show!
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Womble67 on 10 December 2016, 06:41:56 PM
Very good

Take care

Andy
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: paulr on 10 December 2016, 07:23:30 PM
A really good looking game :)

I haven't played the rules but have seen several games played and I really struggle with blunders in Blackpowder, did units really get things so badly wrong in real life :-\

Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Steve J on 10 December 2016, 07:53:23 PM
Lovely looking game and nice touch with the civilians as 'decorative items'.

@ Paul: You don't have to use the Blunders if you don't want to. Personally I like them as they add a touch of uncertainty to the game.
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Duke Speedy of Leighton on 10 December 2016, 08:28:30 PM
What a glorious looking game!
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Subedai on 10 December 2016, 09:50:06 PM
Great looking game and good write up.

MickS
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Techno on 11 December 2016, 08:24:02 AM
Terrific stuff, Neil.  8)

Cheers - Phil
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Leman on 11 December 2016, 10:33:00 AM
Excellent looking game.  =D> =D> =D>
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Roy on 11 December 2016, 03:14:47 PM
Excellent  :-bd
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Westmarcher on 11 December 2016, 07:42:47 PM
Good looking and good sounding game, Neil. I quite like the blunder rules in BP too. Battle accounts are full of subordinate commanders making rash decisions, misunderstanding orders, etc. so whilst it is not too funny when it mucks up your own game plan, I think they are good fun.
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: sunjester on 12 December 2016, 08:05:03 AM
Quote from: paulr on 10 December 2016, 07:23:30 PM
A really good looking game :)

I haven't played the rules but have seen several games played and I really struggle with blunders in Blackpowder, did units really get things so badly wrong in real life :-



Have you read any accounts of military operations?  ;D

Isandlwana, The Light Brigade and Cartagena for just a few British examples
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: Leman on 12 December 2016, 09:59:52 AM
The Union right flank at Chancellorsville, Sickles at the Peach Orchard at Gettysburg; just two ACW examples that immediately spring to mind.
Title: Re: Wilsons creek 1861 Refight
Post by: paulr on 12 December 2016, 07:56:11 PM
Without any actual experience of the rules I may have blundered ;) ;D

I found this entry in the "What ruleset do you use in your last game?" thread while searching for this thread :-\
1) Black Powder (last night)   ;)
2) French II & III Corps attacking Prussian VIII Corps in 1870
3) Definitely, we only looked inside the main rules about twice in 3.5 hours!
4) Definitely used a lot, it falls open on the 'blunder' table!