Return of Dad's Army

Started by Fenton, 27 April 2014, 10:06:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

sebigboss79

People know me as traditional but I urge you to trust me that NOT everything was better in the good old times.

I believe it would still be better if we had kept our hands off!

Remakes = cashing in from unsuspecting people instead of being creative.

clibinarium

Remakes have one major thing going for them (from the remaker's point of view), and that's widespread recognition of the concept. You don't have to explain Dad's Army to many people, they'll be familiar with it already, and hopefully that will encourage them to go and see it. So it seems to be less risky than doing something new.
That does nothing for the quality of what your making though. Usually you end up desecrating something beloved. There are very few remakes that improved on the originals.

If people would ditch the "recognition" factor what they should do is remake stuff that was bad the first time around. Not out and out awful un-saveable  stuff, but maybe movies that had interesting ideas that were executed ham-fistedly or were too ambitious for the budget they had, which would make good movies if given a bit more love or money.

Luddite

http://www.durhamwargames.co.uk/
http://luddite1811.blogspot.co.uk/

"It is by tea alone i set my mind in motion.  It is by the juice of Typhoo my thoughs acquire speed the teeth acquire stains, the stains serve as a warning.  It is by tea alone i set my mind in motion."

"The secret we should never let the gamemasters know is that they don't need any rules." - Gary Gygax
"Maybe emu trampling created the desert?" - FierceKitty

2012 Painting Competition - Runner-Up!

"I have become inappropriately excited by the thought of a compendium of OOBs." FSN

paulr

Lord Lensman of Wellington
2018 Painting Competition - 1 x Runner-Up!
2022 Painting Competition - 1 x Runner-Up!
2023 Painting Competition - 1 x Runner-Up!

sebigboss79


Leman

Quote from: clibinarium on 04 May 2014, 06:38:02 PM
Remakes have one major thing going for them (from the remaker's point of view), and that's widespread recognition of the concept. You don't have to explain Dad's Army to many people, they'll be familiar with it already, and hopefully that will encourage them to go and see it. So it seems to be less risky than doing something new.
That does nothing for the quality of what your making though. Usually you end up desecrating something beloved. There are very few remakes that improved on the originals.

If people would ditch the "recognition" factor what they should do is remake stuff that was bad the first time around. Not out and out awful un-saveable  stuff, but maybe movies that had interesting ideas that were executed ham-fistedly or were too ambitious for the budget they had, which would make good movies if given a bit more love or money.
Lord of the Rings seemed to pull that off. I remember a version from the early 70s which was naff in the extreme owing to lack of technology.
The artist formerly known as Dour Puritan!

Techno

The cartoon version ?
I swear you could tell when they started running short of funds in that one.
Cheers - Phil

Lord Kermit of Birkenhead

As I remember it finished at Helms Deep, and the Orc's spoke Russian....

Also cavalry charge down a cliff.

IanS
FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF
Lord Kermit of Birkenhead
Muppet of the year 2019, 2020 and 2021

Vulpine

It might be good.. We have to look at it unrelated to the original however

Oh... Carton LOTR was a classic!
You're just a pathetic
bunch of tin soldiers,
skulking around the
galaxy in an ancient
spaceship!

Leman

Yes, they had it boxed off.
The artist formerly known as Dour Puritan!

Techno

Stop it !!  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Cheers - Phil.