Chain of Command : russian front, 3 players

Started by ronan, 03 November 2013, 03:19:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ronan


Hello
one of my friends wanted to test this game, so we had a game of Chain of Command with 3 players.
I was lucky ! ( unusual for me !  :) )

I also wrote how we handle 3 players. It worked very well.
http://smolensk.homelinux.org/?p=2283


Duke Speedy of Leighton

You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner


Ithoriel

Another nice batrep Ronan ... though I've come to expect no less from you!

A little practice for my rusty grasp of French too - entertaining and educational! :)

Keep it up.
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data


Albie Bach

Nice report. It looks like you did well, especially as you lost your T-70 so early.
Sadly no longer with us - RIP (2018)

ronan

Quote from: Albie Bach on 04 November 2013, 05:05:15 PM
Nice report.
Thank you !
Quote from: Albie Bach on 04 November 2013, 05:05:15 PM
It looks like you did well, especially as you lost your T-70 so early.

yes, I was lucky and I had a plan. This game needs ro think about plans.
I was very disapointed with this T-70.. realistic event ?  ;)

Hertsblue

Nice game, Ronan, However, as far as I can see the T70 was little more than a stopgap, pending the arrival of more T34s, and was probably only produced as long as it was because it would have been more trouble to stop. Having said that, a single tank in an infantry action is always a hostage to fortune, unless it's something really tough. 
When you realise we're all mad, life makes a lot more sense.

www.rulesdepot.net

Ithoriel

The T-70 was apparently built in factories that couldn't re-tool to build T34s, as a way to boost tank numbers and to keep the factories productive.

The T-70 was, for a tank, small and fast with good, well-sloped armour and a decent 45mm gun. On the downside it's crew of two meant that the commander was loading, firing, commanding the tank, spotting for targets all while trying to keep tabs on what the rest of his formation was doing. As a result unit tactics had to be pretty basic.

As a recon vehicle the T-70 was fine but as a main battle tank it was just better than nothing, which was the alternative.

It's not so much a tank as a tracked armoured car!
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

ronan

you're  right guys. Thanks.
But I thought "better a bad tank than none"  ;)

Ithoriel

Quote from: ronan on 05 November 2013, 12:20:44 PM
But I thought "better a bad tank than none"  ;)


As did the Russians! So a very "in period" decision :)
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data