Soviets absolutely tonked in "Modern Spearhead "

Started by Last Hussar, 25 May 2025, 07:08:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Last Hussar

Found this after a quick search.

QuoteThe GSFG T-64s (misidentified for T-72s)...

And mine are tiny, no wonder I didn't know! I assume there were no Soviet T72 in western Europe then?

I'll just have to class them as T64s then!
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Lord Kermit of Birkenhead

None in the Northag area, but in the Leningrad MD and Checko forces. Also be some in the more favoured Warpact armies.
FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF
Lord Kermit of Birkenhead
Muppet of the year 2019, 2020 and 2021

Last Hussar

Double checked. Mine are definitely T72 - the IR is on the right of the gun. I will just have to ignore that (I have to put on my x3.5 painting glasses to see it!) and call them T64s.
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Last Hussar

Further.
Having checked the MSH stats, there is no difference, apart from the T64 has a gun launched missile... which is no better than the gun (or even worse depending if I am fielding the '78 version, or the '85).

Time to read the Arty rules  ;D  ;D
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Lord Kermit of Birkenhead

Combat differances between the 2 are minimal. Only very few 64's had the missile, T64B. All in service would be A's or B's the first model (T64) had the 115mm gun. All 64's had a multifuel engine which was worse than that in Cheiftain. Most 64's were built in Ukraine.
FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF
Lord Kermit of Birkenhead
Muppet of the year 2019, 2020 and 2021

Last Hussar

Nah, I think mine were build in Liverpool...
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Lord Kermit of Birkenhead

Thought Tankograd was nearer to Kyvi. Nearest tank factory to Liverpool was in Preston, and clsed in late 40's
FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF
Lord Kermit of Birkenhead
Muppet of the year 2019, 2020 and 2021

Duke Speedy of Leighton

You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner

Last Hussar

All I know is I got them from the Guardroom in Dunstable in 88 or 89.
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Lord Kermit of Birkenhead

FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF
Lord Kermit of Birkenhead
Muppet of the year 2019, 2020 and 2021

Duke Speedy of Leighton

You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner

petedavies

Regarding the use of T-72's... I archived a post from the MSH Yahoo group many years ago to justify mine  :)  Here is an extract:

"...

The GSFG was an administrative organisation, and not a combat one.

The organisation included forces that in wartime would be subordinated to three
different fronts.

These fronts included formations from the Soviet and Warsaw Pact armies.

The mobilisation for war would not have begun in Germany, but in the Soviet
Union. That is, the lower readiness category divisions would have commenced
mobilisation and transportation to the forward areas somewhat a month before the
commencement of the offensive.

The forward divisions in the offensive would likely to have come from the lower
readiness units, and therefore would almost certainly have included T-72s coming
from the Moscow and Belorussian MDs among others.

..."

Be interested to hear other opinions, either for or against!

Cheers,
Pete



Last Hussar

I've just tried to find basis of my labelling; 61st Guards Regiment (it's tank). I must have taken this from somewhere, but I have no idea where.   :-\
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

pierre the shy

61st Guards Tank Regiment was part of the 10th Guards Tank Division which was itself part of 3rd Army under Group of Soviet Forces Germany. 

https://www.ww2.dk/new/army/td/10gvtd.htm

3rd Army was expected to be the main opponent for BAOR wasn't it?
"Welcome back to the fight...this time I know our side will win"

Last Hussar

I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry