Pendraken Miniatures Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
04 June 2020, 10:08:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
The Greeks and Persians have been released!
300216 Posts in 17642 Topics by 2243 Members
Latest Member: Bookwizard
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Pendraken Miniatures Forum
|-+  Wider Wargaming
| |-+  Genre/Period Discussion
| | |-+  20th Century (Moderator: GordonY)
| | | |-+  D-Day - how did churchill tanks get onto the beaches?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: D-Day - how did churchill tanks get onto the beaches?  (Read 2202 times)
Wulf
Colonel
*
Posts: 1360


« Reply #15 on: 13 June 2019, 01:08:05 PM »

It appears that all the 79th Armoured Div ARVE's were carried in LCT 5's with 4 vehicles per LCT: 
I feel a diorama coming on...
Logged
Dr Dave
Guest
« Reply #16 on: 13 June 2019, 05:34:32 PM »

Whoaaaaaa - hold on. The AVREs have 6 crew? How dat den?  Lips Sealed
Logged
Raider4
Lieutenant Colonel
*
Posts: 954



« Reply #17 on: 13 June 2019, 06:03:11 PM »

Whoaaaaaa - hold on. The AVREs have 6 crew? How dat den?  Lips Sealed

From Wikipedia: "Crew was increased to 6 to accommodate a demolition NCO in addition to driver, commander, gunner, wireless operator, and co-driver/machine gunner."
Logged
Wulf
Colonel
*
Posts: 1360


« Reply #18 on: 13 June 2019, 07:59:58 PM »

The Churchill was chosen for it's roomy interior, and with all the regular gun ammo removed (and so, I'd have thought, the regular turret loader out of a job...), and a limited supply or Petard Mortar ammo (for all it's blast capability the round is quite compact), there was plenty of space for engineering tools, demolition charges, and, it seems, an extra seat...  

EDIT: I guess from the list above the loader is now a full time wireless operator.
« Last Edit: 13 June 2019, 08:15:38 PM by Wulf » Logged
Dr Dave
Guest
« Reply #19 on: 13 June 2019, 08:12:30 PM »

 Shocked I did not know that - and I love the Churchill tank.
Logged
Wulf
Colonel
*
Posts: 1360


« Reply #20 on: 13 June 2019, 08:21:29 PM »

LCT looks like a good option:

That picture has been annoying me... that's not an SBG, it doesn't have the winch framework on the rear deck. Looks more like the shackles for another fascine. Speaking of which, unless there's something weird about the depth perspective, that fascine is on the rear deck of the Churchill with the framework, despite it looking like the regular fascine support is under that framework... Bit of a weird trio.
Logged
fsn
General
*
Posts: 8993



« Reply #21 on: 13 June 2019, 08:42:39 PM »

Is it another fascine carrier?

And what happened to its main armament?
Logged

Lord Oik of Runcorn
(You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013
Oik of the Year 2014
Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!

15mm is dead. It just doesn't know it yet.
Dr Dave
Guest
« Reply #22 on: 13 June 2019, 08:54:38 PM »

The spigot bomb isnít attached / loaded / in place. Thatís all.
Logged
fsn
General
*
Posts: 8993



« Reply #23 on: 13 June 2019, 08:55:08 PM »

Think the photo was of an exercise - hence the disarmed tanks.  
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/missinglynx/churchhill-avre-s-b-g-assault-bridghe-t317390.html


Hmmm ... could be the SBG

http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/18/180296.htm Suggests 2296 was a LCT(5).


« Last Edit: 13 June 2019, 08:59:19 PM by fsn » Logged

Lord Oik of Runcorn
(You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013
Oik of the Year 2014
Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!

15mm is dead. It just doesn't know it yet.
fsn
General
*
Posts: 8993



« Reply #24 on: 13 June 2019, 08:56:56 PM »

The spigot bomb isnít attached / loaded / in place. Thatís all.

??
Logged

Lord Oik of Runcorn
(You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013
Oik of the Year 2014
Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!

15mm is dead. It just doesn't know it yet.
Wulf
Colonel
*
Posts: 1360


« Reply #25 on: 13 June 2019, 09:01:11 PM »

Hmmm ... could be the SBG
Now that is odd, how is that bridge lowered (and, yes, clearly that is indeed an SBG) other than by simply dropping it, which can't be a great method of placement? I can't see a winch at the back. Maybe a different arrangemant with a smaller winch or one behind the hull.
Logged
fsn
General
*
Posts: 8993



« Reply #26 on: 13 June 2019, 09:04:09 PM »


To answer the Dieppe question, here's a photo of a couple of LST's used at Dieppe.  120' foot long. I'll be honest my LST recognition isn't that good ... but I'm sure one of you will identify the type.

"Three 39-ton tanks Ė code-named Ringer, Regiment and Rounder Ė sat at the front of the 120-feet-long landing craft. Alexanderís two vehicles, a tracked carrier and a Jeep, sat near the back."

http://elinorflorence.com/blog/dieppe-medical-corps
« Last Edit: 13 June 2019, 09:17:33 PM by fsn » Logged

Lord Oik of Runcorn
(You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013
Oik of the Year 2014
Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!

15mm is dead. It just doesn't know it yet.
fsn
General
*
Posts: 8993



« Reply #27 on: 13 June 2019, 09:11:30 PM »

They mention LCT8 in the previous link.

https://uboat.net/allies/warships/ship/17586.html
Says LCT8 was a LCT(1).

https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/disaster-at-dieppe-the-saga-of-lct-8-20121108


Logged

Lord Oik of Runcorn
(You may refer to me as Milord Oik)

Oik of the Year 2013
Oik of the Year 2014
Prize for originality and 'having a go, bless him', 2015
3 votes in the 2016 Painting Competition!

15mm is dead. It just doesn't know it yet.
Wulf
Colonel
*
Posts: 1360


« Reply #28 on: 14 June 2019, 07:23:05 PM »

Now I can get my Churchills to the beach... Still to do final cleanup & some fixes (so the SBG isn't fixed in place, it's propped up by a die).

The LCT  is printed more crudely than normal, because
a) It took 11 hours as it is...
b) I don't really need one, I just wanted to do it...

Note that the bulldozer is wildly out of scale, but that's the smallest it would print without losing bits, especially tracks & the blade support struts.

Logged
mad lemmey
Marquis
********
*
*
Posts: 21085



« Reply #29 on: 14 June 2019, 11:33:06 PM »

Fab!
Logged

Off to the Shed of Decency.

Chekov's Gun, Occam's Razor, and Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle walk into a bar. You won't believe what happens next!

2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner 😎
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!