Pendraken Miniatures Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
19 November 2017, 05:56:43 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
We're now stocking a range of Spray Varnishes which are available at all the UK shows.
243751 Posts in 14788 Topics by 2064 Members
Latest Member: William W
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Pendraken Miniatures Forum
|-+  Pendraken Rules!
| |-+  Cold War Commander
| | |-+  Basing 6mm for CWC
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Basing 6mm for CWC  (Read 347 times)
Orcs
Major General
*
Posts: 3172

Thread Derailment Specialist


« on: 30 October 2017, 10:42:22 AM »

Hi All,

I have just acquired a lot of 6mm modern stuff. I am planning to use CWC for this. Suggestions for basing and suitable infantry required please gents

Orcs
Logged

My aim in life is to P*ss off one person a day.  Currently I am 3 years  1 month  and 23 days ahead of schedule.

The cynics are right nine times out of ten. -Mencken, H. L.

We are all above the line of normality. Its just we all draw the line at a different level
ianrs54
Playtester
Lieutenant General
*
Posts: 5880



WWW
« Reply #1 on: 30 October 2017, 10:50:53 AM »

Ok - basing for CWC seems to depend on the individual players !. Use what looks right. I use 30 x 30 mm bases for vehicles and most artillery and 30x20mm for infantry. 1 vehicle per base and 4 infantry figures looks right for the scale. It does not seem to matter if opponents bases are different in the big games we all have differing sizes, and mine are set the way they as they started for Spearhead. Other base sizes are 20x40 for tanks and APC's, and 40 x20 for infantry. Some people use round bases for HQ's, I use the number of vehicles, and angle the corners on my observer types (I also try to use the correct vehicle), some people do similar for their recce.

By all means join the CWC forum and ask there, which will just prove my point above.

IanS
Logged

FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF HURRAY
Fenton
Major General
*
Posts: 4861



« Reply #2 on: 30 October 2017, 12:18:48 PM »

I haven't played CWC but for BKC I used the small FoW bases for infantry and tanks. If the tanks  didn't fit I just used something slightly bigger. It didn't really matter as Ian says
Logged

If I were creating Pendraken I wouldn't mess about with Romans and  Mongols  I would have started with Centurions , eight o'clock, Day One!
Orcs
Major General
*
Posts: 3172

Thread Derailment Specialist


« Reply #3 on: 30 October 2017, 01:13:07 PM »

What infantry is the  best to get?  The stuff with it are Heroics and Ros and no different to the "blobs" I had when I last had 6mm stuff in the 70's
Logged

My aim in life is to P*ss off one person a day.  Currently I am 3 years  1 month  and 23 days ahead of schedule.

The cynics are right nine times out of ten. -Mencken, H. L.

We are all above the line of normality. Its just we all draw the line at a different level
Nick the Lemming
Lieutenant
*
Posts: 226



WWW
« Reply #4 on: 30 October 2017, 01:57:54 PM »

For modern, you're pretty much stuck with GHQ or H&R. I'm not sure if Irregular do a range, but they're worse than H&R if they do.
Logged

ianrs54
Playtester
Lieutenant General
*
Posts: 5880



WWW
« Reply #5 on: 30 October 2017, 02:13:27 PM »

I'd disagree about the H&R infantry, although the blob comment describes the vastly over-priced GHQ stuff. Vehicles - there are at least 5 manufactures - H&R, who also have the Skytrex moulds, Scotia, Irregular, who also do infantry, CinC and GHQ. Coments on the ranges :-

H&R - most cost effective, the infantry are obvious as to what they are, and reasonably robust
Scotia - avoid the infantry - the vehicles are not quite as good as H&R, but fill in some of the gaps
Irregular - vehicles started as Leciester, they have some that are usable, their infantry, some are bad, some are good when painted (I have lots of Napyys, fantasy, and N. Veitnamese in large numbers)
C-in-C bit more expensive, never seen any infantry.....detail is better than the older H&R, new H&R has overtaken them
GHQ - vastly overpriced, horribly fragile and over detailed. Most of my Cent 5's now have plastic rod barrels. Some infantry figures are good, most not, and they break easily.

Your choice though, and Andy at H&R does NOT pay me anything.
Logged

FOG IN CHANNEL - EUROPE CUT OFF HURRAY
Nick the Lemming
Lieutenant
*
Posts: 226



WWW
« Reply #6 on: 30 October 2017, 02:51:25 PM »

It's WW2 rather than modern, but this should give you some idea of what figures look like from a variety of 6mm manufacturers:

http://www.testofbattle.com/upload/bob/6mm%20Infantry%20Comparison.htm

I'd recommend GHQ, even though they're more expensive, but make sure you buy the individual ones, and not the really shitty group based ones. I think with the modern stuff, they only do individual ones though. The newer H&R are better than the older ones, but they're still much smaller and with less detail. Irregular are terrible.

GHQ show the figures on their website too, so you can see them before you buy.
« Last Edit: 30 October 2017, 02:56:46 PM by Nick the Lemming » Logged

Fenton
Major General
*
Posts: 4861



« Reply #7 on: 30 October 2017, 04:27:20 PM »

Some of the new Scotia stuff looks nice from what I can tell from the website
Logged

If I were creating Pendraken I wouldn't mess about with Romans and  Mongols  I would have started with Centurions , eight o'clock, Day One!
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!